Our organizations come from diverse backgrounds, with concerns ranging from constitutional rights to corporate governance to protecting our air and water. We have many different priorities, but we all agree that last year’s unprecedented Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, requires a strong response.
We are troubled for several reasons by the Supreme Court’s decision to give corporations the right under the First Amendment to spend unlimited funds from their corporate treasuries to support or attack candidates.
In the electoral arena, this decision has brought a flood of new money into elections, ratcheting up the cost of campaigns and increasing the time and resources needed for fund raising. Spending by outside groups funded largely by corporate interests and intended to influence the 2010 elections was more than four times as high than in 2006, the last mid-term cycle. The ads funded by unaccountable corporate interests fueled massive attacks that compounded the negative tone of campaigns and added to the public cynicism of our elections.
In the legislative arena, the mere threat of unlimited corporate political spending gives corporate lobbyists a large new club to wield when lobbying lawmakers, and makes it harder for legislators to vote their conscience.
In corporate governance, there are no rules or procedures established in the United States to ensure that shareholders – those who actually own the wealth of corporations – are informed of, or have the right to approve, decisions on spending their money on politics.
Corporate disclosure and the raised voices of shareholders can help provide a framework to rein in some of the damage in this troubling, new political landscape. We support a variety of legislative and corporate governance solutions to strengthen the voices of the owners of a company and to provide them with the information they deserve concerning the spending of their money in politics.
A SurveyUSA poll commissioned by People for the American Way in February 2010 found that 75% of Americans believe that publicly traded companies should get approval from their shareholders before spending money on an election. Support for shareholder protection was strong across all ideological groups surveyed, with Republicans and those who identified as conservative slightly more likely to support shareholder protection provisions (79%) than Democrats and those who identified as liberals (74%).
Responsible corporate governance requires the involvement of informed shareholders and is not a partisan issue. We believe that holding management accountable and ensuring that political spending decisions are made transparently and in pursuit of sound business is important for both the market and for democracy.
Upcoming Event: Taking Stock Of Citizen's United: How The Law Has (And Has Not) Changed Four Years Later
Symposium at Stetson University College of Law
Take Action Now
The Union of Concerned Scientists, Jan. 21, 2014
Companies, Trade Groups, and Climate Change: Why We Need an SEC Rule on Corporate Political Disclosure
Citizen Vox, Jan. 17, 2014
Corporations have their cakes and eat it too, then deny cake's existence
Brennan Center for Justice, Dec. 4, 2013
Not Because It Is Easy, SEC
Huffington Post, October 30, 2013
Why Both Shareholders and Companies Should Support Political Spending Transparency
Contact UsFor more information about the Corporate Reform Coalition please contact firstname.lastname@example.org